Fight for Baby Jessica deboer/anna schmidt adoption case
79Who's Child is this?
Click thumbnail to view full-size![]() | Amazon Price: $10.15 List Price: $16.95 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $5.30 List Price: $16.00 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $1.99 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $24.19 |
![]() | Amazon Price: $1.37 |
The War for Baby Jessica
I watched the true movie called 'Who's Child Is This? The War for Baby Jessica.' After watching it i had quite mixed emotions. On the one hand i cried when i saw the little girl being taken away from all that she knows (The Deboer's), but i also felt for the birth mother who was fighting to get her baby back, so i started to research the real story behind the film. As we all know films are never fully honest with the facts, because that is not what pulls the viewers in, so here is what i found out.
Robbie Deboer got a infection while on her honeymoon, which resulted in her having to have a hysterectomy. This was obviously very traumatic for Robbie, as it meant she would never be able to become pregnant. Later, Robbie heard from friends in Iowa that a woman named Cara was pregnant, she was told that Cara didn't want the baby, and so Robbie and her husband Jan began proceedings to adopt the baby from birth. On February 8th 1991 Cara gave birth to a baby girl, a delighted Robbie along with her mother, drove up to Iowa to see the baby and start the adoption ball rolling. Robbie received signed parental release forms from both Cara and the baby's apparent father Scott. The Deboer's were ecstatic as they finally had the baby they always wanted. The Deboer's called their new baby Jessica. A few days later, they received a letter from birth mother Cara saying "I know you will treasure her and surround her with love, god bless you all." but just days after receiving the letter, it all started to go very wrong.
Cara who was 25 at the time, had lied about who the babies father was. Cara had originally said it was a man named Scott, but the father of baby Jessica was actually her ex boyfriend Dan Schmidt. After giving her baby to the Deboer's, Cara went to see Dan, and told him what had happened. She had already been having second thoughts about her decision, when she went to a support group for birth parents, and heard the hurt other mothers felt after giving up their children. So on March 6th 1991 when Jessica was just under three weeks old, Cara filed a motion to get her daughter back. A week later Dan also filed a motion to get his baby back. Soon after, a hopeful Cara went shopping for baby things, believing that her baby would soon be returned home to her.
This all came as a big shock to the Deboer's, who believed they had done everything right. They had signed all the relevant forms, and believed Jessica was officially their daughter. Then they discovered that they may loose the baby, they had already bonded with. Before a decision could be made, the courts had to first prove that Dan Schmidt was in fact baby Jessica's real father. However the paternity test results took six months to come back, meaning The Deboer's bonded more with Jessica. In the meantime, birth mother Cara missed out on more of her daughters life. A lot of people say that the Deboer's should have given Jessica back to her mother at the very start, but by law the court could have placed Jessica into foster care, until the paternity test results came back in. Surely neither party, wanted that for the baby girl. When the test results proved that Dan Schmidt was indeed the babies father, the whole adoption case was voided because Dan had never signed a release form. On the 27th December 1991 The Deboer's were ordered by the Iowa court to hand baby Jessica back to her natural parents.
It didn't stop there though, instead of handing Jessica over while she was still a baby, the Deboer's decided to fight to keep Jessica. In doing so, they were legally allowed to keep Jessica while the appeals proceeded. The Deboer's argued that Dan was not a fit father as he already had two children that he doesn't see, so they couldn't understand why he all of a sudden wanted to be a father to Jessica. In January 1992 Iowa heard the supreme case, but the appeals dragged on for months, during this time Dan and Cara got married and just wanted their baby girl home. When the case went forward, Iowa court upheld the lower court hearing, stating that although Dan Schmidt's fitness as a parent was questionable, and the court was tempted to leave Jessica with the Deboer's for the sake of the child, Dan's rights had priority over Jessica's, and so the child must be handed back to the Schmidt's with immediate effect.
But even then the Deboer's refused to give baby Jessica back, and moved their case to Michigan where they won their first victory. In February 1993 when Jessica was two years old, the Michigan Court ruled that Jessica should stay where she was as they believed moving her from the only parents she had ever known would have a terrible effect on her. The Judge then told the Schmidt's, that if they gave Jessica up they would become heroes, sacrificing their hearts desire for their child's well-being. However the Schmidt's declined to give up the fight for their little girl, and in March 1993 the state appeals court threw out the Michigan Judges ruling, stating that they had no right to ignore the first Iowa ruling, that was already in place. On July 1st 1993 the states highest court confirmed that Jessica would be returned to the Schmidt's in a month.
During the court battles, Cara Schmidt had given birth to her second baby girl Chloe. The Schmidt's said that when Jessica returns to them her name would be changed to Anna Lee Jacqueline clausen Schmidt. Some people argued that changing the little girls name at 2 and a half years old, would be very confusing and upsetting for her. However the Schmidt's argued that Anna was always the name mother Cara wanted for her little girl, and they didn't like the name Jessica. The Schmidt's went to visit Jessica at the Deboer's eight times before she was handed back, and little Jessica was last seen screaming and crying when she was taken from her adoptive parents The Deboer's. They were at the time, the only family and home that Jessica had ever known. But just six months later, and back with her birth parents and baby sister Chloe, Jessica seemed very healthy and happy.This was a far cry from what the courts and the Deboer's, said would happen to this little girl, if she was returned to her natural parents.
Today
Anna Schmidt now 19, is doing really well and living with her Mum Cara and partner, and her younger sister Chloe. Anna still see's her father Dan on a regular basis. Anna says she has no memories of her time with the Deboer's, and feels angry towards them for what she calls "legally kidnapping her." Anna believes that the Deboer's caused her birth parents, to miss out on her baby years. To this day, the Schmidt's still don't have any baby photo's of their daughter, they are all owned by the Deboer's. Anna says she has no wish to contact the Deboers and finds it creepy that Jan Deboer keeps a portrait of her on his mantelpiece. Anna's mother Cara said the day the nation saw Anna crying, when she was being taken from the Deboer's home, was because they had cruelly kept her little girl up all night, and panicked her about all the cameramen outside. Cara says she will never forgive them for that.
The Deboer's adopted a little boy after loosing Jessica (Anna) but they said the strain of loosing her caused them to Divorce.They later remarried but then divorced each other again, and still remain apart.
So there is the story that kept everyone griped, and every adoptive parent panicking that their child could too be taken away from them. But who really is at fault here? The Deboer's just wanted to adopt a baby, they were just trying to love her and give her a good home. But should they have given her back at the start? I would have said yes, until i read the court news, and found that a judge had stated, if the Deboer's had decided to give her back, then baby Jessica would have probably remained in foster care until Dan Schmidt's paternity results were in. Why would they want to unsettle the poor girl further. On the other hand they could have given Jessica back when the results were first in. The Deboer's were ordered to give Jessica back to her birth parents, but instead of giving her back, they carried on fighting it. Should they really be criticized for this? Don't we all fight for what we love at some point?
I also felt for the birth parents, Cara was depressed, she had no legal representation when dealing with the private adoption, and she said she didn't want to shame her family as the neighbours were very judgemental where she lived. But then there is Dan, he didn't even know he was the father, so he never even got the chance to stop the adoption going through until baby Jessica was already two weeks old. As soon as Dan found out the truth, he tried to put a stop to the adoption straight away. Cara however had the option, but she chose to lie about the father and have her baby adopted to stop the neighbours talking about her, she gave the Deboer's her baby, even writing to them that she knows they will take good care of her baby girl. However she eventually changed her mind, and chose to take her daughter back from the Deboer's. She was a Mum, who yearned for her baby, and wanted her back. There will always be wrongs on both sides, but i think the real victim here is the child, Anna Schmidt (Baby Jessica) and despite this girls traumatic start in life, and being in the middle of an emotional game of tug of war, i hope Anna can finally be happy now.



















lisa cooper 7 weeks ago
i know the truth about this case, as my family was close friends with dan and clara's lawyer. clara (birth mother) attempted to stop the adoption five days after giving birth. iowa law states that no adoption can be finalized and no physical placement of the child can occur before a thirty day waiting period, precisely to allow the birth parents time to change their minds or for other legal issues to be resolved. the deboer's were in violation of the law when they took physical custody of the child before the thirty day waiting period. when the deboer's then crossed state lines and fled to michigan, a warrant for their arrest was issued on kidnapping charges. had they ever set foot in iowa, they would have been arrested. this was a legal travesty from the beginning. the deboer's and their lawyers knew from the outset they had no legal right to the child and could never win custody based on the law. so they waged media war and threw 'sand in the gears' of the legal proceedings hoping these tactics would delay things until it appeared the child was so old they would somehow win their case. of course there was never any possibility they would be allowed to keep the child. in the meantime, the media's continued campaign of misinformation, lies, and character assassination of the schmidts played out to become one of the worst assaults on a family in american history. the deboers and their legal team should be seen and recorded in the halls of shame. what they perpetrated was apalling.